Foucault (1926 – 1987)
Foucault’s "What Is an Author?" was originally delivered as a lecture in 1969, two years after the first English publication of Barthes’ famous essay "Death of the Author, 1967)". Although never explicitly stated, it’s quite obvious Foucault is directly responding to and criticizing Barthes’ thesis as evidenced by the following statement early in the essay: “A certain number of notions that are intended to replace the privileged position of the author actually seem to preserve that privilege and suppress the real meaning of his disappearance.”
In his essay, "Author Function", Foucault states that the author had
shift from denotatir (biological / historical) to the author as a marker (eg, "Renda"
or "Pramoedya"), which has certain connotations field. Foucault shows how the
field is formed connotation of association posed a variety of texts such as:
biography, autobiography, critic reviews, incident reports involving themselves in the author's mass media, the outstanding reputation in contemporary society, and reputation in a variety of version of literary history (Budianta, 2002).
shift from denotatir (biological / historical) to the author as a marker (eg, "Renda"
or "Pramoedya"), which has certain connotations field. Foucault shows how the
field is formed connotation of association posed a variety of texts such as:
biography, autobiography, critic reviews, incident reports involving themselves in the author's mass media, the outstanding reputation in contemporary society, and reputation in a variety of version of literary history (Budianta, 2002).
Both Barthes and Foucault agree the "Author” is an unnatural, historical phenomenon that has unfortunately obtained mythological, heroic status. And both aim to contradict and complicate this status. However, their methods are drastically different.
If "Death of the Author" actively attempts to kill the Author from the position of full-frontal attack, then "What is an Author?" casually submits to the inevitability of this death and opts instead to further problematize the foundational definitions underlying author and text.
Here, Foucault poses a series of ontological questions regarding a text. Questions like, Where does one draw a line in an author's oeuvre? What constitutes a work? Should everything an author writes, including notes, scribbles and shopping lists, be considered part of a work?
He then goes on to question and complicate the author in a similar vein. “'First, we need to clarify briefly the problems arising from the use of the author's name. What is an author's name? How does it function? Far from offering a solution, I shall only indicate some of the difficulties that it presents.”
Then Foucault restates the function of the “Author” in discourse, he said that “The Author”, the concept of the author is as :
Organizing devices
We realized and we recognized that the author is the “soul”, the “god”, and the “brain” of literary works, and he premitting us to put the certain text together, and sometimes he gave us the possibilities to conclude based on convention or innovation way to his work of arts, and the most crucial and fundamental level it is said that the author is the source of the text. So, no author, no texts.
Interpretation trigger / limiter
We could make some interpretation, if there is / are literary work/s if there is nothing, then we could not gave our interpret of something. And also, he is the one who could made an illusonary boundary about the interpretation of the readers.
FoucouIt wrote that the mention of the name of the author not have function pointer. If the point of Aristotle, the word would be related with 'the author of the analysis' or 'inventor understand ontology'. Designation It does not refer to a person. Function is not meaningful signifikatif name to mention. The mention Pierre Dupont does not mean people want to learn the facts about him, namely, that he lived in Paris, with blue eyes, a doctor, etc.. Name
the author is not functioning as the people in citizenship status. DaJam particular culture, the author's name is a decisive factor in the text the author function is to show their existence, circulation, and air- operation of a particular discourse in a particular community
the author is not functioning as the people in citizenship status. DaJam particular culture, the author's name is a decisive factor in the text the author function is to show their existence, circulation, and air- operation of a particular discourse in a particular community